Windows IT Pro is the authoritative and independent resource for windows nt, windows 2000, windows 2003, windows xp. Features a collection of resources and magazines for windows IT professionals.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


June 2007

Virtual Machine Manager’s Significance

Today, Virtual Server 2005; tomorrow, Veridian
RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More Windows OSs Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

I could argue that Windows Vista, Office 2007, and the looming Longhorn Server aren't Microsoft's most strategically significant launches of 2007. If you're thinking I've lost my mind and you're ready to email me Microsoft's latest revenue numbers, indulge me for a minute: Aside from security, management is the most expensive and time-consuming aspect of Microsoft's products in a network environment. (And security is arguably a management issue.) The new System Center family of products is Microsoft's venture to simplify systems management and assure the health of Microsoft servers and applications. In terms of customer retention and enterprise worthiness, System Center is at least as crucial to Microsoft's continued market dominance as the big revenue-producing products. So while industry attention has been fixed on Vista, Office, and Longhorn, Microsoft launched System Center Operations Manager (Ops Manager) and System Center Essentials (SCE). In the wings is a particularly interesting member of this family: System Center Virtual Machine Manager (VMM). Virtualization is poised to become the most disruptive technology since the commoditization of server hardware. And therefore, I think VMM, which lets you manage virtualized environments, might be Microsoft's most strategically important launch of 2007.

Early Days
According to David Greschler, a Microsoft director of strategic virtualization, IDC estimates that only "5 to 6 percent of all servers in North America are virtualized today." But Microsoft sees huge potential for VMM. David said, "It's clear that to unlock the value of that next phase of virtualization, you need management. If you don't know where your machines are and can't remotely control or move them, you're not getting the benefit virtualization offers as a key enabler to building dynamic servers and software on demand. This is an important release because it allows people to really take advantage of virtualization."

Of course, VMM is not the first or the only tool for managing virtual environments. But David says two differentiators set VMM apart from competing products. First, "customers want a single management platform for both the physical and the virtual. Other products have tools to manage just the physical or just the virtual." Second, VMM lets you "apply all the rich System Center functionality to the virtual world. VMM has a management pack that ties into MOM so you can monitor the health of virtual machines at the same level of granularity as you can monitor physical machines."

Considering competing products such as VMware led me to ask whether VMM lets you manage heterogeneous virtual environments. My translation of Microsoft's answer: Not really. Edwin Yuen, a technical product manager for VMM, replied, "We manage Virtual Server 2005 instances in this release. With Virtual Server 2005's ability to run heterogeneous OSs, VMM can do things like turn them on and off and provision them. Certain advanced features of VMM may not work—[Physical-to-Virtual conversion] P2V and other features (such as integration with certain monitoring levels) are restricted to the Windows platform."

Features
VMM is currently in its beta 2 release and available for free public download at http://www.microsoft.com/scvmm. The features in this release include:

  • a new Outlook-like UI
  • support for Windows PowerShell
  • P2V conversion (P2V is possible only with Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2000)
  • Virtual-to-Virtual (V2V) conversion—using the PowerShell interface in VMM beta 2, you can convert a VMWare disk or virtual machine (VM) to a Virtual Server 2005 Virtual Hard Disk (VHD)
  • 64-bit server support
  • the ability to remotely install every VMM component, including the VMM server, library server, delegated provisioning portal, administrative console, and data store

Veridian
Naturally, I wanted to know whether VMM would support the Longhorn hypervisor (i.e., the platform-level virtualization capability built on the Longhorn Server Core and codenamed Veridian). My translation of Microsoft's answer: Not right now. David said that VMM is scheduled to RTM "this fall for Virtual Server, including Virtual Server R2 SP1. Then in Q4, within a couple weeks of the beta release of Veridian, we'll have a VMM beta to support that form of virtualization, as well. In the first half of 2008, when Veridian RTMs, we will simultaneously ship VMM."

Significant or Not?
I recently wrote that virtualization seems to be the answer to every question these days. VMM is Microsoft's answer to how to deploy and maintain a virtual environment. Are you still thinking I've lost my mind? Then go ahead and send me those emails!

End of Article



Reader Comments
Wow... So Microsoft is finally coming out with a tool to manage all host servers at once. Of course, VMware had this 3 years ago with Virtual Center.

You know, my big question is, why is Microsoft so intent on competing in the Virtual Server market? They bought a third-party company for millions of dollars a few years back, they've spent untold millions updating and supporting that product, and then they give the product away for free..

Yes, the more VMs out there, the more Windows licenses they will sell... But VMware was already providing them with that. Why didn't they just partner with VMware and help VMware's product succeed? It would have been much less costly for Microsoft with all the same benefits, and better for consumers too, since VMware's product are so vastly superior to Microsoft's.

Why this insane need to compete in everything? Recap... they've spent millions and millions, and they give the product away for free. Why? I'd like to see an article about that.

Note that it's still more cost-effective to pay for VMware ESX, because you can get more VMs per physical server with VMware.

For example, say a 4-processor server with lots of memory costs about $25,000 and you can get about 20 VMs on it using ESX, and 12 VMs on it with Microsoft Virtual Server... and an ESX license costs $10k, and Virtual Server is free...

Cost for 240 VMs
ESX - $35,000 x 12 physical servers = $420,000
MS - $25,000 x 20 physical servers = $500,000

So even in hard costs (not counting the vastly superior management features of ESX), ESX is still cheaper.

rrosenkoetter July 13, 2007 (Article Rating: )


Like many other business endeavors, the primary issue is producing revenue: Package less product in a larger box, up the price, slap a "New and Improved" sticker on it, and do some marketing. Aside from the basic OS Microsoft has repeatedly only reached "also ran" status with products (zume zume zume).

The major benefit of virtualization is the ability to increase server density while delaying the replacement of HVAC and UPS systems in the data center. Backing up the VM files also provides the opportunity to provide business continuity more rapidly than spending days rebuilding several windows devices.

237744 July 13, 2007 (Article Rating: )


You must log on before posting a comment.

If you don't have a username & password, please register now.




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
Command Prompt Tricks

One reader shares his tip for setting up the command prompt to reflect a remote path. ...

WinInfo Short Takes: Week of November 24, 2008

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news, including a Vista Capable dismissal request, Zune price reductions, Morrow musings, Novell and Microsoft sitting in a tree ... two years later, Yahoo!, IE 6 on Windows Mobile, and so much more ...

Have New Features Made Exchange Server Backups Unnecessary?

Cluster continuous replication and Volume Shadow Copy Service might have made backups unnecessary in Exchange 2007, but will admins feel comfortable without a dedicated backup solution in place? ...


Related Articles Mount and Dismount VHD Images on Command

Windows OSs Whitepapers Why SaaS is the Right Solution for Log Management

Related Events Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

Windows OSs eBooks Understanding and Leveraging Code Signing Technologies

A Guide to Windows Certification and Public Keys

SQL Server Administration for Oracle DBAs

Related Windows OSs Resources Become a VIP member of the Windows IT Pro community!
Get it all with the VIP CD and VIP access. A $500+ value for only $279!

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!
Solve your toughest technical problems with our experts and access 10,000 + articles online. 30% off

Monthly Online Pass - Only $5.95!
Get instant access to 10,000+ articles from Windows IT Pro Magazine!

TechNet Virtual Labs
Evaluate and test Microsoft's newest products.


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro Windows Dev Pro IT Job Hound ITTV
IT Library Technology Resource Directory Connected Home Windows Excavator Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 Copyright © 2008 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Terms and Use | Privacy Statement | Reprints and Licensing